3580. Find Consistently Improving Employees
Table: employees
+-------------+---------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+---------+ | employee_id | int | | name | varchar | +-------------+---------+ employee_id is the unique identifier for this table. Each row contains information about an employee.
Table: performance_reviews
+-------------+------+ | Column Name | Type | +-------------+------+ | review_id | int | | employee_id | int | | review_date | date | | rating | int | +-------------+------+ review_id is the unique identifier for this table. Each row represents a performance review for an employee. The rating is on a scale of 1-5 where 5 is excellent and 1 is poor.
Write a solution to find employees who have consistently improved their performance over their last three reviews.
- An employee must have at least
3review to be considered - The employee's last
3reviews must show strictly increasing ratings (each review better than the previous) - Use the most recent
3reviews based onreview_datefor each employee - Calculate the improvement score as the difference between the latest rating and the earliest rating among the last
3reviews
Return the result table ordered by improvement score in descending order, then by name in ascending order.
The result format is in the following example.
Example:
Input:
employees table:
+-------------+----------------+ | employee_id | name | +-------------+----------------+ | 1 | Alice Johnson | | 2 | Bob Smith | | 3 | Carol Davis | | 4 | David Wilson | | 5 | Emma Brown | +-------------+----------------+
performance_reviews table:
+-----------+-------------+-------------+--------+ | review_id | employee_id | review_date | rating | +-----------+-------------+-------------+--------+ | 1 | 1 | 2023-01-15 | 2 | | 2 | 1 | 2023-04-15 | 3 | | 3 | 1 | 2023-07-15 | 4 | | 4 | 1 | 2023-10-15 | 5 | | 5 | 2 | 2023-02-01 | 3 | | 6 | 2 | 2023-05-01 | 2 | | 7 | 2 | 2023-08-01 | 4 | | 8 | 2 | 2023-11-01 | 5 | | 9 | 3 | 2023-03-10 | 1 | | 10 | 3 | 2023-06-10 | 2 | | 11 | 3 | 2023-09-10 | 3 | | 12 | 3 | 2023-12-10 | 4 | | 13 | 4 | 2023-01-20 | 4 | | 14 | 4 | 2023-04-20 | 4 | | 15 | 4 | 2023-07-20 | 4 | | 16 | 5 | 2023-02-15 | 3 | | 17 | 5 | 2023-05-15 | 2 | +-----------+-------------+-------------+--------+
Output:
+-------------+----------------+-------------------+ | employee_id | name | improvement_score | +-------------+----------------+-------------------+ | 2 | Bob Smith | 3 | | 1 | Alice Johnson | 2 | | 3 | Carol Davis | 2 | +-------------+----------------+-------------------+
Explanation:
- Alice Johnson (employee_id = 1):
- Has 4 reviews with ratings: 2, 3, 4, 5
- Last 3 reviews (by date): 2023-04-15 (3), 2023-07-15 (4), 2023-10-15 (5)
- Ratings are strictly increasing: 3 → 4 → 5
- Improvement score: 5 - 3 = 2
- Carol Davis (employee_id = 3):
- Has 4 reviews with ratings: 1, 2, 3, 4
- Last 3 reviews (by date): 2023-06-10 (2), 2023-09-10 (3), 2023-12-10 (4)
- Ratings are strictly increasing: 2 → 3 → 4
- Improvement score: 4 - 2 = 2
- Bob Smith (employee_id = 2):
- Has 4 reviews with ratings: 3, 2, 4, 5
- Last 3 reviews (by date): 2023-05-01 (2), 2023-08-01 (4), 2023-11-01 (5)
- Ratings are strictly increasing: 2 → 4 → 5
- Improvement score: 5 - 2 = 3
- Employees not included:
- David Wilson (employee_id = 4): Last 3 reviews are all 4 (no improvement)
- Emma Brown (employee_id = 5): Only has 2 reviews (needs at least 3)
The output table is ordered by improvement_score in descending order, then by name in ascending order.
Database
Preparing judge…